Shared bans?

[Classixz]

Should we have different bans on ZAM EU and ZAM US, or should we keep sharing them like we currently do?

[The One Patriot]

honestly I liked global bans, but now with our current situation we should have them different, if they get a global ban they will go play other zombie mods cough cough, if we have the bans separated then players who are banned from eu will go play the us server

-have different bans for each server

Meh idk. The consequences are if we separate them, you will see a lot more rage quitters more often. More people would careless about the rules simply because they can switch servers once they are banned. Therefore, we should keep it the same system I think. I dont really see why the new stats should result in our old ban system as well. 

[░MyXa░]

It shouldn't be shared, as indy mentioned.

Reason being is that if they're not shared, its more likely that both servers will have a decent amount of people on.

If they're shared then its most probably going to be as always; more on eu and less on us.

[Cookie Monster]

 

no more shared bans pls

[Griggs]

Meh, I would go to US if there was some1 i dont like and grife him, then go to EU :/ (if i was a rule breaker)

[Ramsy]

Pros:

 - more players split upon both servers

 

Cons:

 - more rule-breakers

 

However, I'm up for the split (even tho I voted for option 1).

[Griggs]

hey hey hey, I'm on VACation, what can I do?

[Griggs]

You can give me your knife and kill yourself.

yes i can, but menono if i want 2