stlmokevin

Garca, I can tell you with absolute certainty that none of my statements have been about you; as I don't even know who you are. (Apart from the person who lets someone use his account occasionally.) I don't hate anyone from that group. In fact I've gone out of my way to support every single person IN that group. The fact that they decided to push an agenda rather than discuss this topic is insulting to me and to the people who actually put in a lot of time in this community.

Your group is responsible for this entire argument. Did you not come to us recently and say you were going to retire since you don't feel the pull for ZAM and UU anymore, now this? This is 100% on you guys, not the community. This "new" process has been active for some time now, but the moment someone you don't like gets accepted it's a problem. Also, how exactly are you helping us by rejecting new players? If you feel UU is getting worse by getting bigger, that's your opinion shared mainly by your group. What you few are doing now is akin to holding a knife to our throats and saying "we don't like this because we don't like such and such". Giving you guys the power to accept or deny new members would be the same as shutting UU down. Sorry for the harsh words, but honestly you all deserve it at this point.

I don't think members should be calling players fgt in the first place.

<17:29:16> Channel "The UU Kindergarten Channel That's Not A Kindergarten" was renamed to "Totally Not A New [UU] Channel" by "Gunter✧･ﾟ:* \(◕ω◕✿)/ *:･ﾟ✧*:" ^ Our mature members..

I think creating this topic in a private forum when it applies to all of us (not just members) is disrepectful faith. This isn't something one half of UU should decide when it would apply to everyone who hopes to join UU in the future. and fyi I was definitely not trying to offend you, but your essentially attacking the way I do things.

We can disagree on this, we're meant to have our own opinions.

I've moved this topic so the public can decide. Lets see what the community as a whole think.

Actually, this topic (which is heavily supported by your small core group of friends) is what un-settles the community. This post is like "hey I don't like this because someone I don't like MIGHT get accepted to my clan". If you guys knew the work we (not you) put in to this process you wouldn't complain. I mean seriously. What applicant has you guys crying so bad? I'm genuinely curious at this point.

New Video

I vote no. If you have a problem with a member, get over it. UU will not grow without new members, and it shouldn't be ruled by politics as it was before.

I like this idea a lot. 300 points, so in-between the cade and normal limb. No damage, but heavy push. Could be awesome.

agreed

Creative answers, but the title says it all: "Banned from* many reasons". Also, trying to bribe a platinum purchase to get unbanned.... Appeal Denied.

Now I have to watch Tombstone again...

No need to call him names. If he's leaving, let him leave. He's bitter because he lost trusted after continuing to break rules. Lets just leave it alone.

Paypal rejects certain card companies, such as mastercard. You can always purchase a loadable paypal card from a retailer (Walgreens sells them in my area) and load your money that way.

You "left" weeks ago. Bye.

1 good cade-limb would of brought him down from that spot, fyi. If you jumped from the railing, you might of even been able to knife him.

Placing the shop client side would leave it open for manipulation.

It amounts to the same thing.

I think people would immediately hard-camp in the hopes of winning by surrender votes.

Things are being updated currently, and will return to normal functionality when time allows. For the time being, please be patient.

You need to file a ban appeal. Follow the link below, be sure to include your in-game name, why you were banned, etc.. https://undeaduprising.net/forums/forum/81-ban-appeal/ Thanks

I was the first to throw up the "too op omg", but I agree with pat that I think it's good to have ideas and we shouldn't shit on him for it. I think it would abused, but i like that your thinking of new ways to balance. Maybe pats idea of a strong limb that 1 hits survivors, or a zombie upgrade that makes you slower but you do twice the damage to cades.. something like that maybe. either way, gg gart for suggesting new stuff. never be afraid to do that, and i apologize if I started a backlash.

too op omg